The great preacher Dr. Martin Lloyd-Jones had the practice of not having altar calls at the end of his sermons. Today, it is a practice that takes place almost every Sunday in many of our churches today. The practice of altar calls is a relatively new idea in the history of Christianity. Charles Finny began to practice them as we know them today during the 2nd great awakening. As a result, we need to think carefully about the practice. In his book Preaching and Preachers, Dr. Jones lists out his reasons why he never did alter calls. I share them with you in hopes that they might challenge your thinking like they did my own. The following are the Doctor’s arguments for not doing altar calls:
- It is wrong to put direct pressure on the will.
- Too much pressure on the will is dangerous, because in the end the man may come forward because he has been swayed by the personality of the preacher, but has not been swayed by the truth.
- The preaching and the Word and the call for decision should not be separate in our thinking
- The method of altar calls carries the implication that sinners have an inherent power of decision and of self-conversion.
- There is an implication here that the evangelist somehow is in a position to manipulate the Holy Spirit and His work.
- Alter calls tend to produce a superficial conviction of sin, if any at all.
- By having alter calls you are encouraging people to think that their act of going forward somehow saves them.
- Does it not raise the whole question of the doctrine of regeneration?
The opinionated preacher from Wales is bound to step on some of our toes. I encourage you to buy the whole book and read it. It is fantastic. What do you think? Do you disagree with the Doctor on altar calls? Why? What are the dangers of practicing altar calls? I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments.